Water turns frogs gay

Chemical regulations are often a niche topic, debated only in environmental circles. Frogs, like other amphibians, are naturally much more susceptible to even minor changes in their environment than frogs. Its water use as a herbicide in industrial farming and corn production has been hotly contested turn its environmental impacts.

The extremist wellness influencers claim that so-called globalists are using industrial chemicals, including atrazine, in agriculture and pharmaceuticals to weaken white men in order to replace them with non-white immigrants. The results were the first indication that atrazine could be significantly harming frog populations writ-large.

The claim was popularized by conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, who cited studies on the herbicide atrazine, known to induce spontaneous sex reversal or hermaphroditism in certain frog species, to assert that the U.S. government was "putting chemicals in the water that turn the friggin’ frogs gay" as part of a "chemical warfare operation".

They have also banned hormone therapies used to help kids transition. European regulators have banned it for its impact on the environment. The best response to this is a strong politics nationalism. Democratic presidential candidate Robert F.

Kennedy Gay. has a history of repeatedly sharing unfounded conspiracies that man-made chemicals in the environment could be making children gay or. The herbicide atrazine, one of the world's most widely used pesticides, screws up the sex lives of adult male frogs, emasculating three-quarters of them and turning one in 10 into females, according to a new study by UC Berkeley's Tyrone Hayes.

He regularly promotes nutrition and health content alongside racist and antisemitic conspiracy theories. Another account, called Bronze Age Pervert, was reportedly popular among Trump staffers at the end of his first term.

Discover the real science behind Alex Jones’ gay frogs claim, Atrazine’s effects on frogs, and how to support true amphibian conservation. Prior to the segment, Cornish-Dale estimates his Raw Egg Nationalist account on X had an estimated 80, tofollowers. Some of those is alan cummings gay mated with other male frogs and produced viable eggs.

Other male tadpoles exposed to atrazine remained male, but produced lower levels of testosterone and higher levels of estrogen than those that had not been exposed. Raw Egg Nationalist is one of a few popular anonymous social media accounts that has built up huge Republican followings by combining photos of bodybuilders and buff men alongside white nationalism and social Darwinism.

[1]. Jones spoke about the study multiple times on his show. Multiple Republican state legislatures have tried to ban access to health care like medicines that can pause puberty and give young people time to assess their gender identities. Other studies have found some species of frogs change sex during their tadpole phase in reaction to changes in water temperature.

Pesticide Turns Male Frogs into Females. Other studies have linked atrazine to early puberty in humans and preterm delivery. Cornish-Dale was also heavily featured in the show using his anonymous pseudonym, Raw Egg Nationalist. One of the most popular personalities promoting these views goes by the pseudonym Raw Egg Nationalist online, though in summer he was outed by a United Kingdom nonprofit as an Oxford and Cambridge-educated historian named Charles Cornish-Dale.

Far-right personalities like Jones were not far behind, arguing the study was evidence that chemicals could have similar effects on people. Chemicals in the water are turning frogs gay One of Jones' most notorious conspiracy theories is that the government is using chemicals in order to turn people gay, using a mysterious "gay bomb.

Today, he has more thanCornish-Dale has turned to other conservative media to drum up support for Kennedy. In fact, the last time Trump was president, EPA increased the amount of atrazine it considered safe for frogs and other aquatic organisms, in a move that the Biden-era EPA later criticized as politically motivated rather than science-based.